A reader wrote a very interesting comment which we quote below. Important because – regardless of the concept expressed – use logic to go beyond our approach of just citing the facts, one at a time lining them up, but always trying not to advance towards conjectures. As an Augustan reading, this intervention is therefore good, which we allow ourselves to define as "umbrella-like", starting from the idea of a reader "without a shred of evidence” but which he uses really well – our opinion - the brain. And he asks questions. The same ones that perhaps Italians should start making?
Was it all part of a plan?
In short, we can only grasp the facts and analyze them in detail; readers can instead also go further, comment, hypothesize even in an extended sense, it is their right if they are polite comments and follow the rules of the blog. Roberto's comment is therefore interesting:
“It is clear that more than causing deaths, the coronavirus serves to destroy the economy of a country or region, no more and no less than an embargo, in order to induce that country or region to make certain choices. As far as Italy is concerned, the fact that the virus limited itself to striking in Lombardy and Veneto (at the hands of a German citizen) makes us understand that the plans of the possible "infectors" were these two regions which, with the economy at peak and within a state without monetary sovereignty (therefore incapable of helping them), they would have had to make the only sensible choice for them: secession. These are all hypotheses of course, but they have a certain logic. Continuing with the hypotheses we had Conte, who instead of limiting himself to putting only the two aforementioned regions into lockdown (killing the economy), extended the lockdown to the whole of Italy. By doing so he has put all of Italy in a position to ask for "secession" but at this point from the EU. Brilliant, a bit like a judo move where you pull while your opponent pushes to make him fall. Here too, all suppositions without a shred of evidence, but the reasoning goes..."
As you can see, a comment from a person of kind and caliber, al LINK
This is a reasoning that we can define as intelligent, indeed, although not provable; as it goes over to lining up events. That is, it pushes you to think. Great, the use of the brain is always a noble act.
So, leaving aside reality – and there is a lot of it I would say – of the above, I ask you: if the above hypothesis were proven, what would be the consequences?
First of all, IF the above were true, COVID would probably have been amplified appropriately and "artfully" in Lombardy to create the crisis. Possible? Let's say it cannot be ruled out. From there yes could derive the fact that, for example, it could also have been so-called. volunteer to send COVID patients from Lombardy, a disease that especially attacks the elderly especially if they have other pathologies, right inside the Lombardy elderly residences, as indeed COULD BE - IT SEEMS – have happened. Therefore creating, on the basis of this hypothesis, the COVID elderly emergency in Lombardy, media, elderly people who otherwise only cost, if you think about it (...)(excessive talk for Italy, more like "magic circles"/cenacles beyond the Gotthard perhaps, ...). Crazy to think like that? Yes, crazy. to even think about it, I admit it. But, these days….
@mittdolcino https://t.co/yuVsv81BGB
— Gabriele Sabetta (@SabettaGabriele) August 10, 2020
Does Conte separate the "good grass" from the "bad grass" within the League?
Given the crazy hypothesis above, from the textbook unproven hypotheses nor provable of course, WE EMPHASIZE THIS, certainly in this case there should have been substantial external help to Italy for such a havoc. For example in a joint act Franco-German, the same ones who are demolishing the King today Juan Carlos I in Spain, that is, the Spanish Monarchy, absolutely opposed to the Catalan secession supported by Paris and above all Berlin, where he took refuge Puidgemont. Rey who seems to be the victim of blackmail, it is said (yet), of one of the "Stasi women", not even very hidden if you think about it. To perpetrate the dream of divide and conquer Franco-German to the detriment of the "adversary" countries in the EU, in order to avoid the redde rationem (for the EU) in bed with Dem USA of Obamagate and associated consequences, it goes to little. Coincidentally, the cases of COVID in Spain are almost all on the border with France... And therefore attacking the two countries that have always been and/or are becoming more pro-USA, out of necessity, post COVID (lhe headquarters of the NATO/USA command in Europe will be moved from Germany to Italy or Spain, ed)
In short, internal secession in Italy and Spain could really be on the cards, to save the EU from Trump's attack on Berlin next September, as soon as the US Dem candidate is confirmed for the presidential elections (now we go "further" in saying, it's time...).
Here we are, if Giorgia doesn't listen to us, she will stay out!! @mittdolcino @olindocervi @GiorgiaMeloni @AlemannoTW @Qelsi @GiuseppeConteIT @g_occhioneroGo https://t.co/ADLQKW5c3g
— Megas Alexandros (@MegasAlexandr12) August 10, 2020
Meanwhile, things "evolve" in an Atlantic sense
However, it is a fact that until the end of February there were officially only around 1300 cases of COVID in Italy and not the over 8000 indicated without double confirmation of contagion by the ISS, as per the WHO protocol. And it is curious that as soon as the samples were sent to the ISS for the ritual confirmations – that is, after the official recall from Rome of 26.3.2020 - it was discovered that the Lombard virus had nothing to do with the Chinese virus and was indeed of German origin in patient zero, remember the president of the D'Anna order of biologists who announced it and nothing happened, in sense that no one made him resign… These are facts, note carefully….
Without forgetting that the number of deaths were no longer officially communicated by Fontana separately for each Lombard province since 5.3.2020.
In parallel there was the CLOSE EVERYTHING of Salvini and Fontana, do you remember it? And therefore we can move on to ruminate on the hypothesis "without a shred of evidence” by Roberto. BUT not without logic, on the contrary…
#Salvini "armoring all of Italy was a criminal act and the PdC will have to answer to the Italians"
— Confindustria 💵 ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ (@confundustria) August 10, 2020
Confiindustria historical archive pic.twitter.com/NGwM5YwSGo
“Spot the difference”…
And without forgetting Renzi's messages of support to Fontana during COVID, almost as if they were in the name of Renzusconi...
*****
The images, tweets and videos published (the contents) on the site are taken from the Internet and therefore we believe, in good faith, that they are in the public domain and therefore immediately usable. Otherwise, simply contact us at info@mittdolcino.com so that they are immediately removed. The opinions expressed in the articles represent the will and thoughts of the authors, not necessarily those of the site.
